Fork Lift Trucks

Technical Information Site

Home AES Training Site Map Fork Lift Training Contact Me

 
 
 

 

 

Main Menu

Safety and Training

Fork Lift Test
A C o P
FLT Seat Belts

Legislation

HSE Act
Loler and Puwer
HSE Penalties
FLT Road Regulations

Accidents

FLT Tipover
Falls From Height
Crushing Accidents
Miscellaneous

Fork Lift Design

FLT Traction Systems
Hydraulic Systems
FLT Stability
FLT IC Engines

Amendments to the "Six Pack" regulations    

Changes to the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations (1992) were published on 29th December 1999. The main thrust of these is that employers should not rely on outside assistance but instead use employees from their own organisation in order to conduct risk assessments at their premises.

The LOLER regulations were introduced in 1998 and in the same year the PUWER statutes were modified. The changes to these two sets of regulations are incorporated into the latest Approved Code of Practice.

The UK Government was forced to amend the regulations after the EC raised concerns over the UKs' implementation of the original European health and safety Framework Directive. Apparently the original regulations did not explicitly outline the Directive's requirements for appointing competent persons and also making arrangements for contacting the Emergency Services.

The 1999 amendments clarify specific requirements and introduce some new legal duties on Employers. As a consequence the new ACOP for fork lift operator training which has substantial revisions was published at the end of March 2000. The new ACOP makes it clear that Employers should:

  • Whenever possible, employ a competent person from their own workforce
  • Use that person to carry out risk assessments required by the regulations
  • Use external assistance only when there is no competent worker within the organisation

In some cases there will be a need to consult outside experts and this move is not precluded by the ACOP but Employers should make sure that anyone they appoint as a competent advisor is capable of applying the principles of risk assessment and prevention to the workplace. As an example, a doctor who is appointed should have sufficient experience and expertise in occupational health matters.

As a result of the above an Employer cannot claim that they only breached the law because of a failure by an employee or person appointed to give competent advice and assistance.

The other main aspect of the ACOP is that Employers now need to clarify how emergency services can be contacted although in many circumstances this may only mean making sure that employees know the necessary telephone numbers to call.

The HSE have said that they will take account of the circumstances of each particular case before deciding whether any enforcing action is to be taken.

   
     

Copyright 2007 Tony Sellick

Site updated March 7, 2008